Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plans
| Plan | Description | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
2009 Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan |
From the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Web page about the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan: |
|
|
Sonoma County Transportation Authority Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan |
The Sonoma Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan's components include the countywide document as well as plans for eight participating jurisdictions: Cloverdale, Healdsburg, Town of Windsor, Sebastopol, Sonoma, Rohnert Park, Cotati, and Sonoma County. This link includes only the main countywide plan. |
|
|
City of Sonoma Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan |
The City of Sonoma Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority's (SCTA's) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. It is also a stand-alone document. |
|
|
Sebastopol Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan |
The Sebastopol Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan is a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority's (SCTA's) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. It is also a stand-alone document. |
|
|
Windsor Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan |
The Windsor Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan is a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority's (SCTA's) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. It is also a stand-alone document. |
|
|
Cloverdale Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan |
The Cloverdale Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan is a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority's (SCTA's) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. It is also a stand-alone document. |
|
|
Cotati Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan |
The Cotati Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan is a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority's (SCTA's) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. It is also a stand-alone document. |
|
|
Healdsburg Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan |
The Healdsburg Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan is a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority's (SCTA's) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. It is also a stand-alone document. |
|
|
Petaluma Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan |
The Petaluma Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan is a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority's (SCTA's) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. It is also a stand-alone document. |
|
|
Rohnert Park Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan |
The Rohnert Park Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan is a component of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority's (SCTA's) 2008 Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. It is also a stand-alone document. |
|
|
Transportation Agency for Monterey County Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan |
The following jurisdictions are included in this plan; those with asterisks have adopted their own plans for pedestrians or bicycles or both. Because of the plan's size (>35 MB), we are not linking directly to the pdf. Please visit the Transportation Authority of Monterey County bicycle/pedestrian programs page to access the file. |
|
|
City of Fresno Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Trails Master Plan |
The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan is intended to guide and influence bikeway policies, programs, and development standards to make bicycling in the City of Fresno more safe, comfortable, convenient, and enjoyable for all bicyclists. The ultimate goal of this effort is to increase the number of persons in the City of Fresno who bicycle for transportation to work, school, and errands, or for recreation. |
|
|
SACOG Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan |
The Sacramento Council of Governments (SACOG) Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan was created to guide project decisions under the Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Program, which was adopted by the SACOG Board of Directors in 2003. |
|
|
Southeast Sacramento Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Study Candidate Improvements |
This report illustrates 29 candidate locations in southeast Sacramento for pedestrian and bicycle improvements. It includes detailed information about each location, including a fact sheet listing key components and evaluating the projects.
|
|
|
Main Streets: Flexibility in Design & Operations |
|
|
|
San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan |
|
|
|
Los Angeles Better Bike Plan Campaign (LACBC-Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition) |
This document was produced by the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition to record the process by which the 2011 City of Los Angeles Bicycle Master Plan was developed, with an emphasis on community involvement and communication with the relevant public agencies. |
|
|
Bicycle and Pedestrian Access to Florence Metro Blue Line Station |
This is one of six Concept Access Plans developed for transit hubs across LA County as a result of community feedback, focus groups and other inputs in a joint project between LA Metro and the LA County Bicycle Coalition (LACBC). |
|
|
Bicycle and Pedestrian Access to Compton Metro Blue Line Station |
This is one of six Concept Access Plans developed for transit hubs across LA County as a result of community feedback, focus groups and other inputs in a joint project between LA Metro and the LA County Bicycle Coalition (LACBC). |
|
|
City of Long Beach 2011 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Survey | |
|
|
City of Long Beach Metro Blue Line Bike & Pedestrian Access Plan |
In 2009, the City of Long Beach was awarded funding from Caltrans to develop a Metro Blue Line Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Plan to assess and recommend infrastructure and safety improvements to increase bicycling and walking to all of the Metro Blue Line Stations serving Long Beach. |
|
|
La Mesa Freeway Crossing Plan: A Report to the City of La Mesa on Improving Mobility Across Freeways |
The City of La Mesa is crisscrossed by three limited access freeways. Interstate 8 passes east/west through the middle, splitting the City in two; State Route 94 forms the southern border with Lemon Grove; and for the past 18 years, State Route 125 has been under several phases of construction in the eastern portion of the City. |
|
|
Town of Fairfax Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan |
The 2008 Fairfax Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan update provides for a town-wide network of bicycle paths, lanes and routes, along with bicycle-related programs and support facilities, intended to ensure bicycling becomes a viable transportation option for people who live, work and recreate in Fairfax. |
|
|
City of Sausalito Ferry Terminal to Gate 6 Road Path Feasibility Study |
The Sausalito Ferry Landing to Gate 6 Road Path Feasibility Study examines design options for a bicycle and pedestrian connection between the Sausalito Ferry Landing and the Gate 6 Road and Bridgeway intersection. |
|
|
City of Mill Valley Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan |
The Mill Valley Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan is primarily a coordinating and resource document. This plan focuses on developing a primary network of bikeways, bicycle facility enhancements, bicycle programs and safety improvements, as well as walkways to help ensure good connectivity between destinations such as transit, |
|
|
Marin County Unincorporated Area Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan |
Marin County has many of the attributes needed to become a bicycle-friendly community. This includes smaller, compact towns and cities, a moderate climate, and a population interested in health, environment, and livable neighborhoods. |
|
|
Town of Tiburon Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan |
The 2008 Tiburon Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan update provides for a town-wide network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, along with bicycle- and pedestrian-related programs and support facilities, intended to ensure bicycling and walking become viable transportation options for people who live, work and recreate in Tiburon |
|
|
San Benito County Bikeway and Pedestrian Master Plan |
This Bikeway and Pedestrian Master Plan provides a broad vision, strategies, and actions for the improvement of bicycle and walking in the San Benito County region. This plan is an update to the San Benito County Bikeway and Pedestrian Master Plan adopted in 2002 and was developed to build upon and enhance that plan. The purpose of this plan is to expand the existing networks, connect gaps, address constrained areas, provide greater connectivity, educate, encourage, and to maximize funding sources. |
|
|
San Leandro Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan |
Both the Plan and the Guidelines were reviewed by the Planning Commission, the Council's Facility and Transportation Committee, and the full City Council. The City Council adopted the Plan at its February 7, 2011 meeting. Funding for the update of the Plan was provided by Measure B Bicycle & Pedestrian funds administered by the Alameda County Transportation Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC). |
|
|
San Leandro Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Design Guidelines |
This section outlines design guidelines and best practices for bicycle facilities recommended for the City of San Leandro. |
|
|
Stanislaus County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan | |
|
|
Growing Smarter, Living Healthier: Smart Growth and Active Aging |
If we build places and streets that make it easier for our oldest and youngest to navigate, we all will benefit.—US EPA |
|
|
Albany Active Transportation Plan |
This plan is an update of the Albany Bicycle Master plan and is the city's first Pedestrian Master Plan. They are two steps in support of the city's greenhouse emissions reduction policy of March 2007, which sets the goal of reducing such emissions by 25 percent below 2004 levels by 2020. |
|
|
Measuring Active Transportation: Recommendations for Colorado (Preliminary Report) |
While this has some information unique to Colorado, this document presents a comprehensive look at the best practices for counting walking and bicycling, along with many examples of surveys, links to national datasets, and explanations of the various advantages and limitations of different approaches. |
|
|
L.A. Bike Count: Results from the City of Los Angeles Bicycle and Pedestrian Count |
In September of 2011, the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition (LACBC) conducted the second Los Angeles Bicycle and Pedestrian Count (Count). The objectives of the Count are to raise awareness of the frequency of bicycling and walking in the city and to gather the data necessary to inform policy and planning decisions related to these forms of active transportation. The 2011 Count results show that bicyclists and pedestrians throughout Los Angeles use our public streets and sidewalks for daily transportation, recreation, and other purposes to an ever greater extent. |
|
|
Emeryville Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Update: Draft | |
| Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Promoting Active Transportation in Rural Communities |
This is the result of a roundtable discussion involving Jen Rice, of the Humboldt Area Foundation, Eric Oberg, of the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy in Ohio, and Ronald Cossman and Mark Duncan of Starkville in Motion (Mississippi). |
|
| Beyond Urban Centers |
The Rails-to-Trails Conservancy has collected data about rural rates and types of active transportation, along with links to resources and tools. Their 2011 report is Active Transportation Beyond Urban Centers. |
|
|
|
Health Impact Assessment in Humboldt County General Plan Update |
Humboldt County, a rural county in Northern California, was updating their General Plan. The General Plan Update (GPU) had three growth alternatives to accommodate future population: 1) denser development in urban areas, 2) some growth to exurban areas, and 3) unrestricted growth throughout the county.
|
|
|
It's a Safe Decision: Complete Streets in California |
From the National Complete Streets Coalition and the Local Government Commission: |
|
|
Model Design Manual for Living Streets |
This manual provides principles of good design, as well as a significant number of concept drawings. In many instances, it provides the design concepts that can be used to create construction documents from. In some areas it provides more detail than many existing manuals. For example, it spells out significant detail about sidewalk cross sections along different types of streets in different neighborhoods. It stays away from the rigid standards that often only apply to abstract situations. |
|
|
Alpine County Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan | |
| Calaveras County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans | ||
|
|
Project Concept Report Gateway Park |
From the Gateway Park Working Group:
"More than 10 years ago, the Bay Bridge design team identified a unique opportunity to create a signature park that joins the power and beauty of the new Bay Bridge East Span to the fascinating natural, industrial and transportation history of the East Bay and, as such, creates a bold new gateway to the City of Oakland. Representatives of nine local, regional and state agencies embraced that idea and began to explore the possibilities of a new park.
|
|
|
Butte County 2011 Bike Plan | |
|
|
Amador County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan | |
|
|
Glenn County Draft Transportation Plan | |
|
|
Mariposa County Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan | |
|
|
Modoc County Regional Transportation Plan |
Produced by the Modoc County Transportation Commission. |
|
|
Mono County Regional Transportation Plan | |
|
|
Nevada County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans | |
| Plumas County Regional Transportation Plan |
Prepared for the Plumas County Department of Transportation. |
|
|
|
San Bernardino County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan |
Prepared by the San Bernardino Association of Governments. |
|
|
County of Sutter Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan | |
|
|
Tuolumne County Bikeways and Trails Plan | |
|
|
City of San Clemente Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan August 2012 Draft |
This is the city's first bicycle and pedestrian masterplan and establishes a bikeway system for consideration and makes broad recommendations for improving walkability and connectivity. |
|
|
Alameda County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans |
From May 2010 to October 2012, the Alameda County Transportation Commission updated the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans. The goal of these updates was to reflect current bicycling and walking conditions, needs and priorities in Alameda County. The final plans were adopted on October 25, 2012. |
|
|
Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Strategies for UC Berkeley Campus and Periphery: Recommendations for Implementation |
The high level of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit activity on city-owned streets surrounding the UC Berkeley campus creates a dynamic social environment and gives Berkeley much of its charm. But the streets around the campus (henceforth called the campus periphery) are also places where pedestrians and bicyclists have been injured or killed in collisions with automobiles. This creates liability for drivers, the City, and the University—and worse, causes suffering for crash victims and their families. |
